Comments on: the twitter effect https://darcynorman.net/2010/02/26/the-twitter-effect/ no more band-aids Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:14:22 +0000 hourly 1 By: Sami https://darcynorman.net/2010/02/26/the-twitter-effect/#comment-196782 Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:20:23 +0000 http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=3545#comment-196782 Reddit and Digg took some traffic too so instead of people commenting on blogs, they started commenting on social link sites I guess that probably ate up delicious too… Also, for you D I think your priorities may have changed too instead of blogging investing more offline time in real life.

]]>
By: Sami https://darcynorman.net/2010/02/26/the-twitter-effect/#comment-196781 Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:18:04 +0000 http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=3545#comment-196781 and facebook too… they coincided with each other. It seems like fb and twitter killed delicious too as no one really shares bookmarks any more and I remember you were big into that D. Flickr also got hit by fb. Also the economy went down too so a lot interest in this stuff declined than when it was high times and millions to be had from some arbitrary web project.

]]>
By: dnorman https://darcynorman.net/2010/02/26/the-twitter-effect/#comment-196780 Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:23:18 +0000 http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=3545#comment-196780 not a clue. I don’t have access to anyone else’s logs. if I had to guess, I’d say that traffic as a whole is up, but spread out over more sites, with some performing role-specific tasks (twitter for banter, etc…)

]]>
By: aka_le_Mulder https://darcynorman.net/2010/02/26/the-twitter-effect/#comment-196776 Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:36:10 +0000 http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=3545#comment-196776 Interesting version.
Do you think all blogs had traffic decrease starting from 2007 and why traffic in 2009 was almost like in 2004? Any ideas?

]]>
By: Sami https://darcynorman.net/2010/02/26/the-twitter-effect/#comment-196756 Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:59:16 +0000 http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=3545#comment-196756 It’s hard to say which direction the internet is going. The US government seems to be starting a discourse of scaremongering to assert more control over the net, they intend to stop their “hands off” policy and I think that this can only be bad: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/cyber-war-hype/

At the same time Google and Microsoft seem to want to own every aspect of the internet. I was sort of creeped out recently because Google has added realtor search to its map product, and so now not only do they know the outside of your house, if you ever put your house or room up for rent, they also know the inside of your house as well. Google’s CEO has said that if you don’t want people to know it, perhaps you shouldn’t be doing it on the net, but there is a difference between putting it on the internet and every aspect of your life being stripped searched by Google at every corner. Anyone who uses jquery or any of the javascript libraries cached at Google is further exposing their visitors to the all seeing eyes of Google. Google goggles is even more creepy because I can only imagine people taking millions of pictures of everything which are geocoded in Google’s cloud. Let’s just say the implications are easy to get paranoid about.

It seems to me that the very nature of the net is under threat from both corporations and governments as they attempt to exert the same sort of control over it as they did television and radio back in the day. The whole net neutrality thing I thing was only the opening salvo. Under the surface the war is brewing that will fundamentally alter things in such a way that I don’t think things will go back.

]]>
By: Sami https://darcynorman.net/2010/02/26/the-twitter-effect/#comment-196750 Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:15:22 +0000 http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=3545#comment-196750 I am a big fan of the ownership argument, so I would say not a good thing. The less control we have over the medium, the less freedom we have to do with it what we want to…

]]>
By: Chris Garrett https://darcynorman.net/2010/02/26/the-twitter-effect/#comment-196745 Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:16:15 +0000 http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=3545#comment-196745 It would be cool to have a scientific answer but most people I talk to were profoundly impacted by Twitter and other social sites/services, and those changes are only increasing. When you look just at comments – conversations are mostly happening outside our blogs, from Twitter to FriendFeed and now Buzz. While Twitter has helped generate traffic, it also reduced my posting frequency. The link graph has been hugely affected because people Tweet instead of link, etc etc.

These tubes will never be the same. Good thing or no?

]]>
By: dnorman https://darcynorman.net/2010/02/26/the-twitter-effect/#comment-196726 Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:03:27 +0000 http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=3545#comment-196726 also, it’s not valid to try to extrapolate anything from this to a broader context. this is just for what’s happened on my blog. it is likely different on other blogs, and for people in different online communities.

]]>
By: dnorman https://darcynorman.net/2010/02/26/the-twitter-effect/#comment-196725 Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:00:25 +0000 http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=3545#comment-196725 agreed. there’s definitely a changing pattern of discourse – it’s not just twitter, but a shift from individual to communal spaces. distributed, etc…

]]>
By: Sami https://darcynorman.net/2010/02/26/the-twitter-effect/#comment-196722 Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:07:21 +0000 http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=3545#comment-196722 Could create a graph with NeoJ and use some java NLP toolkits for analysis if you were up to it. I don’t think it’s just twitter, the web itself is changing due to trends and fads and blogging may be classified as a trend or fad — only time will tell.

]]>