The Blog @ Calgary on Suburban Sprawl

Ted posted a great piece on suburban sprawl in Calgary, with references to the Sierra Club’s research. I agree that Calgarians are afflicted with the “Don’t fence me in” syndrome. A city with the geographical area of Orange County, but a population of only 1 million people. Calgary has approximately 10% the population density of New York City. About 20% the density of San Francisco. About a quarter the density of Vancouver. (comparison of various population densities)

Calgary has approximately the same population density as Boise, Idaho. That just doesn’t scale. Nobody wants to turn Calgary into New York City – that density would drive most Canadians insane – but approaching Vancouver’s density wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing, if done properly.

As a SUV-driving suburban dweller, I’m as much a part of the problem as anyone. My footprint is much smaller than many others, though (my SUV is really just a big station wagon, built on the Camry chassis rather than a Big Heavy Truck frame, and my suburban home is a decidedly modest one, with 1,400 square feet and a lot that is only ~36 feet wide).

But, the design of my suburban community could be much better. The commercial services are all aggregated in the exact centre of the community, meaning those living toward the edges are much more likely to drive to the corner store (it’s a 15 minute walk from my house – one we don’t take often enough).

One thing in our favour is the public transportation system. Although it’s far from perfect, I do get almost door-to-door service between my house and the University via bus. And the LRT is coming closer, meaning the schlubs that have to commute downtown will have an easier time leaving their H2s at home.

Update: The comparison between Calgary and Orange County was unbelievably inaccurate. Calgary is much smaller than Orange County, and actually has a higher population density, according to Wikipedia.

Ted posted a great piece on suburban sprawl in Calgary, with references to the Sierra Club’s research. I agree that Calgarians are afflicted with the “Don’t fence me in” syndrome. A city with the geographical area of Orange County, but a population of only 1 million people. Calgary has approximately 10% the population density of New York City. About 20% the density of San Francisco. About a quarter the density of Vancouver. (comparison of various population densities)

Calgary has approximately the same population density as Boise, Idaho. That just doesn’t scale. Nobody wants to turn Calgary into New York City – that density would drive most Canadians insane – but approaching Vancouver’s density wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing, if done properly.

As a SUV-driving suburban dweller, I’m as much a part of the problem as anyone. My footprint is much smaller than many others, though (my SUV is really just a big station wagon, built on the Camry chassis rather than a Big Heavy Truck frame, and my suburban home is a decidedly modest one, with 1,400 square feet and a lot that is only ~36 feet wide).

But, the design of my suburban community could be much better. The commercial services are all aggregated in the exact centre of the community, meaning those living toward the edges are much more likely to drive to the corner store (it’s a 15 minute walk from my house – one we don’t take often enough).

One thing in our favour is the public transportation system. Although it’s far from perfect, I do get almost door-to-door service between my house and the University via bus. And the LRT is coming closer, meaning the schlubs that have to commute downtown will have an easier time leaving their H2s at home.

Update: The comparison between Calgary and Orange County was unbelievably inaccurate. Calgary is much smaller than Orange County, and actually has a higher population density, according to Wikipedia.

New Year’s Eve Field Trip

I took a trip downtown for the afternoon of New Year’s Eve, wanting to hang out with Evan and see what he thought of some of the cooler things downtown. We hit the Glenbow Museum, Calgary Tower, and Banker’s Hall. Photos and more after the jump…

I took a trip downtown for the afternoon of New Year’s Eve, wanting to hang out with Evan and see what he thought of some of the cooler things downtown. We hit the Glenbow Museum, Calgary Tower, and Banker’s Hall. Photos and more after the jump…


First up was lunch, of course, and then we headed to the Glenbow Museum to check it out. I was totally expecting it to be a running tour, trying to keep him interested. But, he totally surprised me – he loved the whole museum! He kept wanting to see more. We went through the Petra exhibit – the first North American stop on the tour of artifacts from the Jordanian lost city of Petra. That was pretty cool. I was snapping photos the whole way, not realizing that exhibit has a photo ban. Oops. They were pretty cool about it though, which was nice. There was also a craft station, where we got to make all kinds of things, like a mosaic (inspired by the stone/tile mosaics of Petra), and a copper wire figure (also inspired by the exhibit). What a great way to pull kids into the exhibit.
Petra 4

Then, we went though the Niitsitapiisinni Blackfoot exhibit. Evan loved the tipi, and kept referring to the manniquins inside it as “the girls” (he was confused by the long hair, I assume). He also was very interested in the stuffed/mounted buffalo (which was pretty impressive).
Tipi

Next up was the West African “Symbols” exhibit, which was very well done. We watched the traditional dance (via very old video) for a couple of minutes – as long as attention span would allow 🙂 then moved through to the Glenbow Museum School. That’s a nice touch. A classroom set up for kids and families to do interactive stuff like make crafts. We made a mockup of a celebratory hat for New Year’s Eve, using stamps and stencils.
African artifacts exhibit

A few more exhibits, and we made our way back downstairs, heading to the Calgary Tower. 600+ feet up the elevator, and Evan makes a beeline to the glass-floor observation platform. Yikes. But… he doesn’t even pause. Doesn’t even test to see if there’s an invisible floor there. He sees other people standing on it, and that’s good enough for him. He’s pointing out cars and buildings and trains through the floor. Then, I think it sunk in that he was floating over 600 feet above the ground, and he’d had enough of that 🙂
I can see my house!

Quick spin through Banker’s Hall for a Jugo Juice (it was too cold out to hike to Atomic, we wanted to wuss out and stay within the +15 system), and onto the train home. Great day. We’ll be doing that again real soon.

Calgary Blog

Ted Buracas just launched a Calgary blogging site: the Blog at Calgary. It looks like a great start, with links to local media, arts, music, entertainment, etc… I’ve already found a new Jamba Juice replacement called *atomic – downtown, just north of The Bay. Next time I’m downtown, I’ll have to check it out (although that may not be for awhile – I seem to be downtown about once per season or so…)

the Blog @ Calgary

Looking forward to watching/helping it evolve. Calgary isn’t quite as online hip as the ‘Couv, but it’s a great start! I’m subscribed to the feed from the Blog@Calgary.

Ted Buracas just launched a Calgary blogging site: the Blog at Calgary. It looks like a great start, with links to local media, arts, music, entertainment, etc… I’ve already found a new Jamba Juice replacement called *atomic – downtown, just north of The Bay. Next time I’m downtown, I’ll have to check it out (although that may not be for awhile – I seem to be downtown about once per season or so…)

the Blog @ Calgary

Looking forward to watching/helping it evolve. Calgary isn’t quite as online hip as the ‘Couv, but it’s a great start! I’m subscribed to the feed from the Blog@Calgary.

Calgary Peacetime Disaster Plan

I’d emailed my alderman this summer to ask for a copy of the disaster response plan for Calgary, in light of recent events. I figured it would be a Good Idea™ to give the plan a once-over before a disaster struck, since by then we’d be too busy feasting on the goo in each other’s skulls to read the instructions about how to evacuate a city of 1 million people.

I just got a response back, after it was forwarded to the Fire Department. The response had a boilerplate “this is confidential, intended for the recipient of this email only” but that’s just silly. Here’s the response I got.

Mr. Norman,

I apologize for the delay in getting back to you on this matter and acknowledge your concern on such an important topic with all that we have witnessed in world events recently.

To answer your question, the Calgary Peacetime Disaster Plan is not a public document. It is held by heads of the various agencies that would be required to respond in an emergency, Civic Administration leaders and our elected officials. Unfortunately, the response plans and capabilities of most major organizations, including municipalities has been removed from the public domain following a worldwide change in security vigilance following the events of September 11, 2001.

Calgary’s Plan is based on an all-hazards approach that outlines a coordinated response to those incidents most likely to have a major impact on our city. The incidents range from floods and other natural disasters to “man-made” events such as a hazardous materials spill. These events form the subject matter for regular exercises that are developed to practice the communication and team decision making capabilities of our agency heads, and to ensure that the plans and capabilities of the resources in those agencies is adequate to deal with the emergencies most likely to affect us.

As far as the specific evacuation plans that you refer to, Calgary Disaster Services would work with the Calgary Police Service, EMS, Calgary Fire, Calgary Transit, Calgary Roads, the RCMP and other stakeholders to expedite an evacuation in a time of emergency based on the details of that incident. For example, it would not be prudent to say that in a disaster residents of Tuscany should evacuate south via Nose Hill Drive and Stoney Trail to the Trans Canada Highway and out of town. That information may lead you into the hazard area for the incident.

The City of Calgary’s Disaster Social Services and the Canadian Red Cross have procedures in place for establishing reception centres where citizens can register and have their food, clothing and shelter needs accommodated in an emergency. They would also provide assistance with locating relatives who may be separated from their families.

There are many things that you can do to enhance your own preparedness, including:

  • Develop a supply of necessities to provide for you and your family for the first 72 hours after the onset of an emergency. Access for responders may be limited after the initial impact of an incident, so the best thing you can do to aid your survival capabilities is to have water, food and medication stores for all those in your household.
  • Establish a plan within your network of family and friends to contact each other and ensure their safety in an emergency. This can also include sharing the duties to contact or check on any family members who may have special needs.

I hope this helps answer some of your concerns with regards to Calgary’s state of preparedness. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions.

Tony M. Messer
A/Coordinator
Calgary Disaster Services

If our ability to respond to an emergency, and to keep the city safe from “terrorists” is based on keeping the response plan a secret, we’re pretty screwed. Security through obscurity isn’t security.

I’ve created a (so far empty) wiki page in case anyone thinks it’s a good idea to have a response plan available to the people affected.

Here’s my response to Tony (copied to the Alderman):

Tony, thank you for your response. I am more than a little concerned about the need for secrecy regarding the disaster response plan. Security through obscurity is not security (or, worse, is a false sense of security). It would be better for the plan to be a public document so that the people of Calgary knew what was expected of them, and Calgary Disaster Services would have to prepare to truly secure any valuable plans/assets rather than hoping nobody knows about them.

I hope you’ll reconsider the decision to keep the response plan a secret. I’ve created a wiki page at
http://wiki.ucalgary.ca/page/CalgaryDisasterResponsePlan

in case any members of the public want to coordinate a plan on their own.

I’d emailed my alderman this summer to ask for a copy of the disaster response plan for Calgary, in light of recent events. I figured it would be a Good Idea™ to give the plan a once-over before a disaster struck, since by then we’d be too busy feasting on the goo in each other’s skulls to read the instructions about how to evacuate a city of 1 million people.

I just got a response back, after it was forwarded to the Fire Department. The response had a boilerplate “this is confidential, intended for the recipient of this email only” but that’s just silly. Here’s the response I got.

Mr. Norman,

I apologize for the delay in getting back to you on this matter and acknowledge your concern on such an important topic with all that we have witnessed in world events recently.

To answer your question, the Calgary Peacetime Disaster Plan is not a public document. It is held by heads of the various agencies that would be required to respond in an emergency, Civic Administration leaders and our elected officials. Unfortunately, the response plans and capabilities of most major organizations, including municipalities has been removed from the public domain following a worldwide change in security vigilance following the events of September 11, 2001.

Calgary’s Plan is based on an all-hazards approach that outlines a coordinated response to those incidents most likely to have a major impact on our city. The incidents range from floods and other natural disasters to “man-made” events such as a hazardous materials spill. These events form the subject matter for regular exercises that are developed to practice the communication and team decision making capabilities of our agency heads, and to ensure that the plans and capabilities of the resources in those agencies is adequate to deal with the emergencies most likely to affect us.

As far as the specific evacuation plans that you refer to, Calgary Disaster Services would work with the Calgary Police Service, EMS, Calgary Fire, Calgary Transit, Calgary Roads, the RCMP and other stakeholders to expedite an evacuation in a time of emergency based on the details of that incident. For example, it would not be prudent to say that in a disaster residents of Tuscany should evacuate south via Nose Hill Drive and Stoney Trail to the Trans Canada Highway and out of town. That information may lead you into the hazard area for the incident.

The City of Calgary’s Disaster Social Services and the Canadian Red Cross have procedures in place for establishing reception centres where citizens can register and have their food, clothing and shelter needs accommodated in an emergency. They would also provide assistance with locating relatives who may be separated from their families.

There are many things that you can do to enhance your own preparedness, including:

  • Develop a supply of necessities to provide for you and your family for the first 72 hours after the onset of an emergency. Access for responders may be limited after the initial impact of an incident, so the best thing you can do to aid your survival capabilities is to have water, food and medication stores for all those in your household.
  • Establish a plan within your network of family and friends to contact each other and ensure their safety in an emergency. This can also include sharing the duties to contact or check on any family members who may have special needs.

I hope this helps answer some of your concerns with regards to Calgary’s state of preparedness. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions.

Tony M. Messer
A/Coordinator
Calgary Disaster Services

If our ability to respond to an emergency, and to keep the city safe from “terrorists” is based on keeping the response plan a secret, we’re pretty screwed. Security through obscurity isn’t security.

I’ve created a (so far empty) wiki page in case anyone thinks it’s a good idea to have a response plan available to the people affected.

Here’s my response to Tony (copied to the Alderman):

Tony, thank you for your response. I am more than a little concerned about the need for secrecy regarding the disaster response plan. Security through obscurity is not security (or, worse, is a false sense of security). It would be better for the plan to be a public document so that the people of Calgary knew what was expected of them, and Calgary Disaster Services would have to prepare to truly secure any valuable plans/assets rather than hoping nobody knows about them.

I hope you’ll reconsider the decision to keep the response plan a secret. I’ve created a wiki page at
http://wiki.ucalgary.ca/page/CalgaryDisasterResponsePlan

in case any members of the public want to coordinate a plan on their own.